fiuture days will Dark days for US

vinay mohanty

DEAR AGENT FRIENDS


DEAR AGENT  FRIENDS,

  PL DONT ENTER EMAIL IDS OF UR CLIENTS IN LIC RCT DETAILS.
LIC IS STEALING THOSE IDS AND GIVING THEM TO LIC DIRECT MARKETING.
FEW DAYS BACK I HV ENTERED MY EMAIL ID TO MY OWN RCT-- I HV STARTED
GETTING REGULAR EMAILS FOR BUYING NEW POLICIES FROM DIRECT MARKETING
--WE HV TO TAKE THIS MATTER WITH LIC MANAGEMENT.
ASK THEM TO STOP CHEATING THE AGENTS

some of our friends writen this letter but it is true

jago sansad jago


vinay mohanty

Government propose to amend the Insurance Act 1938


You all are aware that the Government and IRDA propose to amend the Insurance Act 1938 in the coming session of Parliament. These proposed amendments in the act will:


1. Stop payment of balance commission and gratuity to the widow of an agent, means the hereditary commission goes,


2. Powers of the Parliament to decide the rates at which commission to a life insurance agent of LIC as well as that of a private insurer have to be paid, will be transferred to IRDA. Means the rates of commission will be decided by IRDA.


3. Delete the provision of prohibition of stopping of payment of commission to insurance agents.


These amendments will dismantle the agency structure in India prepared after years of hard work and after spending hundreds of crores.


This will cause lakhs of crore loss to the Government in the form of premium not received which is being utilized for long term investment in the infrastructure development of the country. The story of mutual fund, PPF and General insurance is before us where in business has been badly reduced due to neglect of insurance advisors/agents.


Please recall the recent draconian suggestions made by Devendra Swaroop committee to stop payment of commission to us.


In the light of the above we have decided to launch nation wide agitation against these proposed amendments in the Insurance Act.


vinay mohanty

JEEVAN SUGAM 813 PLAN WILL LANCH 25Th FEB2013

rajnathsnigh and others assure they will do best

Our leaders met Mr. Rajnath Singh ji President BJP, Mr. Arun Jaitely Leader of Opposition Rajya Sabha, Smt. Sushma Swaraj, Leader of Opposition Lok Sabha and discussed about Insurance Bill.All leaders assure us that they will protect our interest.After that we met with Mr. Rajiv Takru (chief secy ministry of finance for financial matters) He also assure that he will do his best.

vinay mohanty

special medical report chart


vinay mohanty

agent can take3 agencis life/general/Health

NOW ANY insurance  AGENT CAN TAKE 1.ONE AGENCY OF GENERAL INSURANCE.  2.one AGENCY OF A HEALTH INSURANCE .and 3.one Lifeinsurance agency LETEST INFORMATION.
vinay mohanty

IRDA new chief TSVijayan


21 February 2013

T S Vijayan, former chairman of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) has taken over as chairman of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA).

Vijayan, 60, takes over from J Hari Narayan who ended a five-year tenure on Wednesday.

The IRDA head is appointed for a term of five years or till the age of 65 years.

An IRDA statement said Vijayan has taken charge as its chairman today.It is a comeback for Vijayan who was demoted to managing director of LIC following charges of financial irregularities. He had also taken voluntary retirement in November 2012.

Vijayan, who was battling corruption allegations with regard to investment decisions made by LIC during his tenure, however, got a clean chit from the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the finance ministry.


http://www.domain-b.com/finance/insurance/irda/20130221_vijayan.html

vinay mohanty

Insurer’s Managed Funds to Touch Rs30 lakh crare Mark in 5 yrs: IRDA Chairman


The size of funds managed by insurers in the country is expected to reach whopping level of Rs 30 lakh crores in next five years, a jump of 70% from current level, outgoing Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) chairman J. Hari Narayan said.

He said that when the insurance industry was opened up in 2000, the total controlled fund was about Rs 1 lakh crores. It was Rs 8 lakh crores in 2008 and it is Rs 18 lakh crores now.

He also said that he is in favour of government’s view of hiking Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) limit in insurance sector to 49% from current 26%. This would lead to a substantial flow of funds in capital intensive sector. It is estimated that insurance sector will require at least Rs 30,000 crores in next five years to double its size.

vinay mohanty

The total investment corpus of LIC has touched Rs 14.8 lakh crores


The total investment corpus of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) has touched Rs 14.8 lakh crores (provisional) as of 31 December 2013 as against Rs 13.49 lakh crores at the end of December 2012, registering a growth of 10% in first nine months of this fiscal.

Investment in government securities accounted for a major chunk in LIC’s investments with investments worth Rs 7.27 lakh crores. Housing and infrastructure investments stood at Rs 1.91 lakh crores. And the rest included investments in the corporate sector and project loans.

Central government securities contributed Rs 4.77 lakh crores, followed by state government and other government guaranteed marketable securities.

Among housing and infrastructure investments, LIC has maximum amount of investments in the power sector, contributing Rs 94,294 crores.

This was followed by housing with Rs 41,900 crores. Other areas in infrastructure included irrigation, road, bridges, port and telecom.

LIC is expecting to invest a total of Rs 2.4 lakh crores in bonds, equities and government securities in the current financial year.

In terms of performance of different distribution channels, out of the first premium income, Rs 1,486 crores came from the chief life insurance advisor. Bancassurance and alternative channels contributed Rs 870.63 crores and direct marketing contributed Rs 218 crores.

vinay mohanty

Agent freinds allert from this letter


vinay mohanty

ADHAR CAR AS ADDRESS FROOF& ID PROOF


vinay mohanty

Does FDI 49% benefit the common man?

Does this benefit the common man?
  

 This change does not benefit the common man, as he is the target for all insurance companies, whether Indian or foreign, who try to extract maximum business from the gullible public, who are carried away by the sweet talk and tall promises made by the insurance salesmen. In fact they are concerned more about their own commission rather than the welfare of the insured. Insurance business is one where there is rampant mis-selling and the insurance companies go scot free because of a number of conditions included in the policy in small print, but never communicated in advance.
  

 Our country has a low insurance density and every company selling the insurance feels that there is abundant scope to expand its operations and hence this proposal to increase FDI in insurance has been received with great applause by the industry. Only time alone will tell whether this irrational exuberance is justified considering the fact that there is political opposition to this move and this change requires approval of the Parliament.
  

 If and when this proposal becomes a law there is bound to be a great demand from foreign companies to enter our country because of the abundant opportunity provided by the large population and the growing per capita income of our people. During the last twelve years, if over 40 foreign companies have entered our country as joint venture partners, with the increased FDI cap, we may expect another 100 companies to come within the next twelve years. Unfortunately, some of our people are carried away by the foreign names and brands, and that there is a perception among our people that foreign companies are better than the home-grown companies. But the fact is that foreign companies are as bad as or as good as local companies, and insurance business, whether run by Indians or by foreigners has the same objective, as in all business, of maximizing returns to the owners even at the cost of the insured.
  
How to protect “aam aadmi” from exploitation by the insurance companies?  
                 

 It is abundantly clear that mere hiking the FDI cap to 49% does not in any way benefit the common man, unless it is accompanied by stringent regulations to protect the “aam aadmi” from exploitation.  

Once the Insurance Amendment Bill is passed

Once the Insurance Amendment Bill is passed, it is expected to remove lot of operational hurdles and is expected to align the provisions of the 1938 Act in line with the current industry requirements, CL Baradhwaj says

The Insurance Act 1938 provides the basic framework for regulation of the insurance industry in India. With the enactment of IRDA Act, 1999, the insurance business was opened to the private sector. The number of insurance companies has shot up from six nationalised insurance companies in 1999 to 51 insurance companies (24 life and 27 non-life), excluding GIC (General Insurance Corporation of India), the national reinsurer, as on date.

Based on the report of the Law Commission published in 2004 and the Expert Committee constituted by IRDA under the chairmanship of KP Narasimhan, published in 2005, an Insurance Amendment Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha in December 2008. The Bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance. Subsequently, owing to the dissolution of the 14th Lok Sabha, the Committee could not present its report. Upon constitution of the 15th Lok Sabha, the Bill was referred to the Standing Committee on Finance in September 2009. This article summarises the key amendments proposed to the Insurance Bill with the corresponding recommendations of the Standing Committee.

Section 2 (6C)—Health insurance business to be recognised as a separate line of business

So far, there is no definition of health insurance as a separate line of business. The Bill proposes to define health insurance as effecting of contracts which provide for sickness benefits, long-term care, domestic and overseas travel cover and personal accident cover. Necessary amendments are being made in the definition of life insurance business to include health insurance business.

Section 2(7A)—Definition of Indian insurance company (which also defines the extent of foreign equity in insurance sector)

The Bill proposes to amend the definition of the Indian Insurance Company as a public limited company in which the foreign equity does not exceed 49%. However, the Standing Committee on Finance, based on various comments received, was of the view that the possibility of tapping the alternate routes of the domestic market for meeting the capital requirements of the sector has to be explored first and therefore has recommended for retention of the foreign equity cap at 26%.

The Bill also proposes to recognise Lloyds, the Society of Underwriters based in London, one of the world’s large insurers, to be recognised as a foreign insurance company, for doing business in joint venture with Indian partners and to act as reinsurers through their branches in India. However, since Lloyds do not have any Indian representation or underwriting desks in India, the Standing Committee has advised that this proposal be reviewed.

Section 6—Minimum capital prescribed for health insurance companies and foreign reinsurance companies operating through a branch in India

The Bill proposes to fix the minimum capital for health insurance business at Rs. 500 million. However, the Standing Committee has found no justification for a preferential treatment for health insurance companies and has recommended for raising it to Rs. 1 billion on par with life and general insurance companies.

It has also been prescribed that foreign reinsurance companies operating as reinsurers through their branch(es) in India shall have a minimum net owned funds of Rs. 50 billion.

Section 6A—Recognition of tier-II capital for insurers

Currently only equity share capital can be issued by insurance companies. The Bill seeks to vest powers with IRDA to allow insurance companies to raise other forms of capital as may be approved by the Authority. However, such Tier-II capital will not have any voting rights.

Section 6AA—Divesting of equity by Indian promoters to 26% after 10 years

The existing provisions state that no Indian promoter shall hold more than 26% in an Indian insurance company beyond 10 years from the date of commencement of business. The Bill proposes to delete this section. This would mean that an Indian promoter can continue to hold up to 100% in Indian insurance companies even after the 10th year.

However, the Standing Committee has recommended retention of this Section to enable diversification of ownership in insurance companies.

If the foreign equity cap in insurance has been retained at 26%, after 10 years of existence, either the insurance companies must go public or Indian promoters must be allowed to continue at 74%. However, many insurance companies who have crossed 10 years are still not ready for a public issue and therefore, retaining this section would mean that the Indian promoter holding 74% would have to dilute it’s equity to 26% and have at least two more Indian promoters (with each not holding more than 26%) after the 10th year, which is difficult in the current situation. Therefore, it is recommended that this Section be deleted or alternatively the 10 year window for dilution be increased to atleast 15 years.

Section 29—Liberalisation of restrictions on sanction of loans and advances by insurers

Currently, the Section prohibits any kind of loan or advances other than a highly restricted list, viz., to insurance agents not exceeding the previous year’s renewal commission, with the overall ceiling of loans or advances restricted to a very nominal sum of One hundred rupees. Further, any other loans and advances are generally prohibited. This has created an operational hurdle for many insurance companies as sanction of trade advances to vendors and employees in the normal course of business was also restricted by the Section.

The Bill has substituted a new Section which enables sanction of loans and advances as per norms to be specified by the Authority and the Scheme approved by the board of directors of the insurer. The ceiling of advances to commission linked to his previous year’s renewal commission has, however, been retained in the Act.

Section 32D—Minimum business in third party risks of motor vehicles for general insurance companies

The Bill introduced a new Section 32D which mandated every general insurance company to undertake minimum percentage of business in third party risks of motor vehicles as may be specified by IRDA in the regulations, with health and reinsurance companies given exemption. However, some apprehensions were raised before the Committee that third party risk can be made mandatory only if the pricing is left to be decided by the insurers with the continuance of the motor third party pool system. In view of the above, the Committee has stated that till such time these issues are resolved, sharing of liability by the insurers through the mechanism of common pool would be the best course.

It may be pertinent to note that IRDA have already issued an order for dismantling theabove pool system.

Section 38—Recognition of partial assignments of insurance policies

The existing Section 38 which provides for transfer of insurance policies has been significantly amended. It is proposed to recognise ‘partial’ assignment—i.e. transferring a portion of the interest in a life insurance policy. This would help avoiding transfer of interests in policies beyond the requirement, as currently the policies can be transferred in toto only. An assignee getting a partial right in an insurance policy, shall not be entitled to further assign or transfer the residual amount payable under the same policy

Further, the Bill also proposes to empower insurers to reject requests for assignments if it is not bona fide or if it is against the interests of policyholders. This was intended to prevent trading in insurance policies.

The Standing Committee, however, has recommended that the Act should specifically prohibit speculative assignments instead of leaving the issue to the discretion of insurers.

Section 39—Protection of rights of nominees under insurance policies

Currently the position of a nominee under an insurance policy is a subject matter of litigation and is not settled. Unlike Banking Regulation Act, the existing Insurance Act does not give unfettered rights to the nominees to receive the policy monies to the exclusion of the legal heirs. Though the insurer can get a valid discharge by paying the claim amount to the nominee, the position of the nominee is that of a trustee for the legal heirs. While there have been many judicial precedents on the position of a nominee, the Bill proposes to put to an end to this ambiguity by recognising two types of nominees—a beneficial nominee and a collector nominee. A beneficial nominee has absolute rights under the policy to receive the policy benefits to the exclusion of the legal heirs. Only parents, spouse and children can be beneficial nomineesOn the other hand, a collector nominee made responsible for handing over the proceeds to beneficial nominee or legal heirs of the policyholder as may be prescribed by the regulations.

The Standing Committee has advised the Ministry to examine the issue of possible contradiction of the above classifications with the Indian Succession Act.

Section 40, 40B & 40C—Vesting powers with IRDA on prescribing ceilings on insurance commission, payment of commission on orphan policies and fixing ceilings on expenses of management

The existing Sections 40, 40A, 40B & 40C are proposed to be consolidated into one section—under Section 40, which proposes to dispense with prescription of ceilings for commission under the Act and give powers to IRDA to prescribe commission by way of regulations.

However, the Standing Committee has differed in its views on this proposal and has recommended that a guaranteed minimum amount or percentage of premium which agents would be entitled to as Commission could be prescribed in the Act to continue the statutory protection currently bestowed by the Act on the insurance agents. It is pertinent to note that the existing Section 40A only prescribes ceilings for commission and does not guarantee any minimum commission.

Further, currently there are restrictions in Section 40(2A) which allows allotment of lapsed insurance policies solicited by terminated agents to existing agents of an insurer only under certain exceptional circumstances. This provision is proposed to be deleted as it does not support persistency of insurance policies. IRDA is proposed to be vested powers for drafting regulations in this regard.

The existing Sections 40B & 40C have been substituted by simple sections which state that the details of expenses of management shall be furnished in such manner and form as may be prescribed by IRDA by way of Regulations.

Section 42—Dispensing with the process of licensing of agents and entrusting responsibility of appointment of agents to insurers

The system of licensing of insurance agents has outlived its existence and therefore the Bill proposes to do away with the process of licensing of insurance agents. Henceforth, the power to appoint agents is proposed to be given to insurance companies subject to fulfilling the minimum qualifications, training and examination requirements as prescribed by IRDA. The disqualifications for insurance agents have been retained in the Act.

However, the Standing Committee has observed that keeping in mind the current unhealthy sales practices it might be inappropriate to do away with the role currently played by IRDA in licensing of agents and hence has recommended that the licensing system must continue.

Section 44—Payment of renewal commission after termination of agents

Currently, Section 44 mandates that an insurance company cannot deny payment of renewal commission after termination, if an insurance agent has served for five years with an insurer. If the agent has completed 10 years, such entitlement to renewal commission after termination vests only if the agent, after termination, does not work directly or indirectly with any insurer. Such renewal commission is payable to the legal heirs of deceased insurance agent after his death.

While the Bill sought to delete this section, the Standing Committee has recommended retention of this section to protect the interests of large number of agents. The object behind deletion of Section 44 was that while compensation is paid after termination, the policyholders are not serviced resulting in lapsation. This point may be examined before taking a final call. Necessary clause to protect the interests of existing agents may be introduced.

Section 45—Fixing time lines for denial of claims by insurers on the grounds of misstatements etc

Insurance contracts are contracts ‘uberrima fides’—meaning contracts of utmost good faith where the customer is expected to disclose about the status of health, family, income, etc to enable the insurer to correctly assess the risk and fix the premium. Where any non-disclosure is established or mis-statements have been made in the proposal form, the current provisions of Section 45 prevent an insurer from denying a claim received after two years from the date of effecting the policy unless the three cardinal principles as mentioned in the Section are satisfied (that such mis-statement or concealment was made on a material fact, that it was fraudulently made by the policyholder and that the policyholder knew at the time of making it that the statement was false or was material to disclose).

The Bill proposed to amend the section to state that an insurer cannot deny a claim under an insurance policy after five years for any reason whatsoever—i.e. even if the policyholder had fraudulently made a statement on material fact or fraudulently concealed a material fact.

The Standing Committee has proposed to reduce the five-year term to three years which means after three years no claim under an insurance policy can be repudiated on any ground whatsoever.

General

Substantial increase in penalties for violations

The penalties for non-compliance with provisions in the Insurance Act have been significantly increased. Some examples:
  • Under Section 102, for failure to comply with IRDA directions etc, the penalty has been increased from Rs. 5 lakh to Rs. 1 lakh for each day subject to a ceiling of Rs. 1 crore
  • For failure to achieve rural or social sector compliance—Rs. 25 crore
  • For rebating, the penalty is increased from Rs. 500 to Rs. 1 lakh
  • For allowing persons not eligible as insurance agents to sell, insurer is liable for a penalty of Rs. 1 crore
  • For violations of provisions regarding investments under Section 27, 27A, 27B etc, maximum penalty is Rs. 25 crore
The Standing Committee has observed that the penalties proposed in the Bill are too steep and may not even be commensurate with the capital base of insurance companies. Accordingly, it has proposed that penalties be rationalised and the penalties proposed be revisited. Further Committee has also advised that alternative deterrents such as publicising names of defaulting companies be resorted to.

Securities Appellate Tribunal to be the appellate authority against IRDA’s orders

It is proposed to recognise Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) as the Appellate Authority against the orders passed by IRDA. The Standing Committee has advised that the composition of SAT as well as qualifications for members of SAT be reviewed keeping in mind the need for considering persons with special knowledge in the field of insurance as well.

Procedural matters removed from the Insurance Act and powers vested with the Authority by way of regulations

Some of the procedural matters proposed to be removed from the Act and powers vested with IRDA to frame Regulations:

  • Power to prescribe documents required for registration of insurance companies
  • Power to prescribe forms of Tier-II capital for insurers
  • Power to curb excessive remuneration paid by insurers
  • Power to prescribe fees for assignments and nominations under insurance policies which can be charged by insurers
  • Procedure for collector nominee handing over the claim proceeds to the beneficiary nominee or legal heirs of the deceased life assured
  • Power to prescribe ceilings on expenses of management
  • Power to frame regulations for payment of commission on orphan policies
  • Framing of scheme for sanction of loans and advances by insurers
Conclusion

The Bill would require amendments based on the recommendations of the Standing committee. Once the Bill is passed, it is expected to remove lot of operational hurdles and is expected to align the provisions of the 1938 Act in line with the current industry requirements.

The author is the vice-president (compliance) of Bharti-AXA Life Insurance. The views expressed herein are his personal views and should in no way be deemed to be the views of Bharti-AXA Life Insurance or any of its associate companies.

STUDY RIGHT


There is one straight road to success in selling. It's paved with knowledge. Competency never lacks opportunity."  

STUDY RIGHT

We believe you create a future, characterized by high performance and fulfillment, by making a responsible commitment to think right, work right, sell right, study right, and live right.

Here are ten strategies for forming the habit of studying right.

.  Be a student of selling. In a world of change, you are never completely educated. You must keep educating yourself to cope with change. The more you learn about your job, the less fear there is. Fear is born out of ignorance.

.  Prepare well. Spectacular performances are always preceded by spectacular preparation. Cultivate the will to prepare.

.  Develop a mentor. Self-talk shapes your selling life. Take charge of your thoughts. Monitor what you are telling yourself about your situation and about your potential in selling.

.  Watch your self-talk. Learn as much as possible about your prospects -- their reputations and capacities, who they are buying from now and what they are receiving for their dollars. Decide to be a shrewd observer.

.  Stay brilliant on the basics. Rely on these fundamentals: Build credibility, be well mannered, simplify your recommendations, speak prospect's language, speak as one having authority, sell at your buyer's pace, avoid exaggeration and dogmatic statements, use repetition, make it the prospect's idea, summarize strategically, and close with confidence.

.  Achieve competency levels. Become known for what you know. This is the high payoff. Now, your reputation precedes you.

.  Write effectively. Simplicity is the formula for successful communication.

.  Develop the slight edge. This principle has to do with what a slight improvement in one skill can do to your performance over a period of time.

.  Out-distance competition. To out-distance your competition you must learn more and better ways to out-serve them. You then become your own best recommendation.

.   Build your Research and Development Department. Develop a library of sales support material to stay current on your products and keep you sharp on new selling techniques. Subscribe to sales publications, and utilize the resources available on the Internet.

"GO ALL OUT - NO IN BETWEEN IN 2013!"

Good luck and good selling,

Jack and Garry Kinder



New insurance FDI plan to end oppn



Written by Bimabazaar- Adminstrator
 Monday, 10 December 2012 11:55


Having secured Parliament’s approval for foreign direct investment (FDI) in multi-brand retail, the government is considering tweaking the planned amendments to insurance laws to win over opposition parties’ support for reforms in this key sector.

As per a fresh plan prepared by the finance ministry, the government plans to propose keeping the FDI cap in the insurance sector at 26% and allowing another 23% as foreign institutional investment (FII). Key members of the standing committee on finance from the Opposition have indicated their willingness to consider this proposal, which could also speed up listing of insurance companies on the exchanges.

This compromise formula is being prepared as the UPA government is bound to face stiff opposition to an earlier plan to raise the FDI cap insurance to 49% from 26%. The standing committee on finance had opposed any increase in FDI limits in the insurance sector.

Sources said the new proposal has the approval of finance minister P Chidambaram, and the government is trying to securing opposition parties' concurrence on it.

Bhartruhari Mahtab, Biju Janata Dal MP and a member of the standing committee on finance, told FE: “We have given our report to maintain the FDI cap at 26% in the insurance sector, and not raise it to 49%.” When asked about the new proposal being prepared by the government, he said: “Let the suggestion come to us (the standing committee), then we will take a call. Personally, I think it will be premature to react right now."

FE could not reach senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha – chairman of the committee – recently. But in an interview to FE last month, Sinha had said that the government could bring the new proposal – 26% FDI and 23% FII and overseas corporate bodies – to the committee for its views.

Mahtab said that before bringing in the 26% FDI plus 23% FII proposal, the government will have to withdraw the changes being proposed to the existing Bill and the new proposals will have to be routed through Parliament afresh.

Finance ministry sources said permission to portfolio investment in the insurance sector could be pushed through executive orders. None of the insurance companies are listed on stock exchanges in India now. The Securities and Exchange Board of India recently unveiled norms for initial public offerings by insurance companies.

“The government can come to the standing committee with this; it hasn’t so far. That’s when we will decide,” Sinha had said.

http://www.financialexpress.com/news/new-insurance-fdi-plan-to-end-oppn/1042785/2

vinay mohanty

LIC CHAIRMAN IN MUMBAI MARHTAN


vinay mohanty

Set up a system to make it easy for people to give you referrals.


Set up a system to make it easy
for people to give you referrals.

Would you like to have your clients, friends and family tell all of their co-workers, friends, family and everyone else they know about you?
Then let's start with some basic truths!

 The reason most agents and advisors have trouble getting referrals is that people don't generally talk about salespeople! What is there to talk about? Except maybe negatives?

However, they do talk about people who have made a real, positive difference in their lives! They tell people about the accountant who saved them thousand of dollar on income taxes! They talk about the doctor who helped them to finally quit smoking! Or, the attorney who helped them to avoid a costly lawsuit!

The talk about people who have actually helped them solve a problem(s). They talk about the people who have gone beyond what was expected. The talk about people they like, trust and respect.

So if you want people to talk about you, and tell all of their co-workers, friends, family and everyone else they know about you, then make yourself referable!

Making yourself referable means creating value from the customer's perspective. It sounds obvious, but your products and services have value directly in proportion to how well the customer perceives that your product/service solves a serious problem they have, or creates an opportunity for them. For example, does it allow them to have more income to do the things they want to do in retirement, or does it help the client enhance their eligibility for college financial aid because of some special feature.

You can't create your value proposition and sell value unless you identify critical information from the customer. The best way to create value is to help the prospect to identify a problem or opportunity for themselves. by asking Questions during a thorough fact-find!

Remember, 'Good enough' never is! Even excellent service is probably not enough to get people to talk about you, to attract the clients you really want. Only extraordinary service will draw the world to you!

Give away valuable extras: free reports, newsletters and seminars.

Teach a course and offer free educational workshops.

Help clients and prospects to identify and solve their main problems. Not just the problems that you can make money on.

Provide service before your clients ask.

Conduct regular annual reviews, client workshops, client surveys and client appreciation events. Don't wait for your clients to call you with their questions or a problem.

Learn from every mistake. Your customers, especially the unhappy ones, are your best Research & Development team! Call them, ask questions and learn from them.

This extreme service attitude will draw the world to your door!

vinay mohanty

If bimabill 2012 passe in lokosabha



             10/2/2013 The BIMA Bill 2012 passed by Lok Sabha recently would come into force after its approval by the Rajya Sabha and assent by the President of India. The new law will have far reaching impacts, especially in areas where we as professionals are most concerned. Significant proposed amendments will be deliberated upon in the emergent meeting.
VIEWS:-1.FDI Partners in the Indian Insurance Companies from 26% to 49%
               2.Existing Provision  on Insurance Act 1938 Sec40,40A,41,44,45(Commission or otherwise for procuring business, Limitation of expenditure on Commission, Prohibition of rebates, Prohibition of cessation of  payment of commission, Interest of policy holder.
             3.Amendments proposed to be made by IRDA.(Penalty,Commissione ,Few Sec omitted.
            4.Expectations of  LIAFI (Hereditary commissione our right,no changes agent commissione,Need to be preserved as it is &others benefit.

JAGO -- INSURANCE AGENT

Protest   INSURANCE AMENDMENT BILL -2008

"AN OBSTACLE MAY BE EITHER A STEPPING STONE or

A STUMBLING BLOCK "

vinay mohanty

Investors lost Rs.1.5 trillion due to insurance mis-selling says Mr chidambarm FM article from live mint

New Delhi: Finance minister P. Chidambaram couldn’t have been more spot-on when he spoke this week about what’s hurting the insurance industry’s growth in India.

“In my view, the reason why insurance is stumbling in India is because of mis-selling of products and complex products,” Chidambaram said in a public speech on Monday, reported by PTI. “If you want to sell insurance to India, you must sell simple products and must make it absolutely clear to agents and other officers that they should not mis-sell.”

Policyholders in urban India, where few buyers of insurance can claim they don’t have a rip-off story to tell, would know exactly what Chidambaram meant.

It’s a phenomenon that goes back to the first decade of privatization, when an around three-million-strong sales force, which took home up to 40% of the first-year premium as commission, sold life insurance products that were built like investor traps.

Complicit in this were life insurance companies that stood to benefit because of very high surrender charges (charges levied by the insurers when an investor stops paying premiums midway), as investors let policies lapse when they discovered that the policies were unsuitable.

According to a Goldman Sachs report, profits from the lapsed policies were enough not only to wipe out losses in some companies, but actually show profits at the aggregate.

The other group to benefit was the sellers of these products—agency commissions for the period 2004-05 to 2011-12 totalled Rs.1.13 trillion.

The mis-selling of life insurance products in the decade after the 2000 privatization is a textbook case of poor regulation and mis-managing the transition from a state monopoly to free markets. So big became the public uproar over the predatory sales of life insurance products that the regulator, in July 2010, was forced to step in and change the rules around the product being mis-sold—the unit-linked insurance plan (Ulip). But the damage had been done. Ulips, almost single handedly, have caused a deep erosion of investors’ money and confidence in the markets.

vinay mohanty

SELL RIGHT


"The best ways to keep people coming back are:
be believable, credible, attractive, responsive and empathetic."

                                                                    SELL RIGHT

We believe you create a future, characterized by high performance and fulfillment, by making a responsible commitment to think right, work right, sell right, study right, and live right.

Here are ten strategies for forming the habit of selling right.

.  Give it your best. Do every selling job to a finish and accept nothing but your best every time. As a professional salesperson, you are paid for the quality of service you provide with what you know, for those you know.

.  Look like a winner. If you look like a winner, it's much easier to be one. You'll look as if you represent a reliable company. You'll look as if you're accustomed to influencing people and closing sales.

.  Enjoy every sales call. Before every sales call, ask yourself this question: How would I feel about making this call if I knew it was going to be a good sale?

.  Pay attention. Learn as much as possible about your prospects -- their reputations and capacities, who they are buying from now and what they are receiving for their dollars. Decide to be a shrewd observer.

.  Build relationships. All things being equal, or not equal, prospects tend to buy from salespeople they trust, respect and like the most.

.  Sell ethically. What is your ethical base? Can you articulate it? Can you identify how it influences your personal and professional behavior? Ethical behavior is doing the right thing, because doing the right thing is the right thing to do.

.  Manage sales resistance. Realize resistance doesn't mean denial or refusal. In selling, it means, "Give me a reason to buy!"

.  Close sales confidently. The most important factor in closing sales is not the customer. It's not the product. It's not the price. It's not the terms. It's not the weather or business conditions. It's you - the individual behind the sale - the closer who is thinking right and who has mastered a closing strategy.

.  Develop endorsements. No advertising is as trusted as the spontaneous testimony of delighted customers. Expect endorsements.

.  Serve what you sell. Never forget a client. Never let a client forget you.

"GO ALL OUT - NO IN BETWEEN IN 2013!"

Good luck and good selling,

vinay mohanty

How NRIs can buy LIC Policies?


NRIs can buy LIC Life Insurance cover under Non-Medical (Special) scheme or Medical scheme, depending on their health, sum insured they are opting for and where (country) they are working -

What is a Non-Medical (Special) Scheme?
1- Applicable if insurance is obtained during visit to India or through Mail Order Business (when LIC Agents visits the country of residence of NRI for completing the necessary formalities)
2- Maximum age at entry would be 45 years
3- LIC Plans with high risk cover and term rider benefits would not be allowed.
4- The proposer should be employed in Government or reputed commercial firm or should be a professional such as Chartered Accountant, Doctor, Teacher, Lawyer, Accountant, Engineer, etc.
5- This scheme is applicable to those NRIs who are residing in Group VI, VII and VIII countries only. ( See Annexure-V for group details).

What is a Medical Scheme?
 When proposer has to undergo medical tests (special medical tests) to buy LIC Policies. Blood, Sugar, Heart, S.Chol, ECG, Thread Mill etc required as per policy Amount and age.

Who is a Non-Resident Indian as per LIC?
 As per LIC following persons will be treated as NRIs for taking Life Insurance Policy -
1- A non-resident Indian is a citizen of India temporarily residing in the country of his/her present residence and holding a valid passport issued by the Government of India.
2- NRI should not be a green card holder. He/She should not have applied for or planning to apply in the near future for acquiring citizenship of his /her present country of residence or any other country.
3- It is clarified that People of Indian Origin having foreign nationality and residing in foreign countries (PIO) are not considered as NRIs for the purpose of allowing insurance.

What Documents Required by NRIs to apply for LIC NRI Life Insurance?
1- Prescribed Proposal Form depending on the type of policy selected (Form No. 300 in majority of the cases).
2- NRI Questionnaire (Annexure-II).
3- Medical Report (not applicable if the proposal is under non-medical scheme).
4- Special Questionnaire (Annexure-III) (if proposal is under 'Mail Order Business' and if the agent does not visit the country of residence of proposer).
5- Special Medical Reports, if called for.
6- Attested Copy of Relevant Pages of Proposer's Passport.
7- Proof of Age and Income.
8- Initial Deposit equivalent to Instalment Premium under the proposed plan of insurance.

Things to Take Care
1- Minimum Sum Assured allowed would be Rs. 2 lakhs and maximum would depend on conditions of insurability. However, under mail order business, maximum sum assured would be limited to Rs. One Crore only.
2- Personal Financial Questionnaire (PFQ) and/or Proof of income in the form of income tax returns, copy of employment contract where emoluments are mentioned, Certificate from Chartered Accountant, etc. would be required if the sum assured is high or if the proposal is submitted through Mail Order Business.
3- All types of plans are allowed subject to the conditions that -
a- Critical Illness Benefit is not granted.
b- Term Rider Benefit would be restricted to certain limit of Sum assured
c- Sum Assured would be restricted in respect of term insurance plans.
4- Policies are issued in Indian Rupees only

Are LIC's premiums higher for NRIs as compared to resident Indians?
 No. The premiums are the same for residents and non residents. However, if NRIs are living in countries where risks are higher, premiums maybe higher.

Are there any limits on the sum assured?
 In case of LIC policies, if the NRI chooses to conduct his medical examination in the foreign country, the sum assured will be limited to Rs 1 crore. If the NRI has his medical examination done on a visit to India, then he can get a higher cover. But it depends on individual underwriting.

vinay mohanty

IRDA has Revised Norms for Traditional Life Insurance Products


The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has revised the minimum death benefit and minimum surrender value norms for traditional life insurance products. Traditional life insurance products now come with a mandatory higher minimum death benefit and surrender value.

 What is changed?
1- Minimum Death Benefit
 For customers below 45 years, the minimum sum assured should be higher by 10 times (as against the existing five times) the annual premium or 0.5 times the annual premium multiplied by the term of the policy or 105 per cent the premium paid as on the date of the policyholder’s death.

2- Minimum Guaranteed Surrender Value
 There is also a minimum guaranteed surrender value of 50 per cent of the total premiums paid, if the policy is surrendered in the second or third year while the same would be 75 per cent for the fourth year, and goes progressively upward.

 What happen to Existing Policies?
 Life insurers have been given time to withdraw group and individual policies before March 31 and June 30 respectively and have to file for product approvals afresh in line with the new guidelines.

 Last year in June'2012, the IRDA issued a draft guidelines on the proposed above changes in life insurance products.

vinay mohanty

SUMASSURED ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS


SUM ASSURED ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS.
AGE Upto  30 years 22 times of gross Annual Income.
AGE   31 to 40 tears 17 times of gross annual  income.
AGE   41 to 50 years 12 times of gross annual income
AGE   51 years and above 10 times of gross annual income.


vinay mohanty

LIC chairman on vision2020

click on billow link for chaiman merohotra,s statements
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9243963/TOIM_2013_2_1_8.pdf


new jeevan nidhi at a glance


vinay mohanty  9396258548, 9848258548